look on the separation of the state. Although even before, and after Charlemagne and his feudalism (not entering the substance of what is everything, from the barbarian invasions to the courts - the accounts and Marquis, Arabs, etc. ..) has sought a cultural renaissance and a "decentralization" from 'Empire and its legacy, which was then a de facto centralization economic - political and social (community), the past decades and centuries, through the Renaissance, and yet it seems that we should be looking for a "centralization - decentralization - (either in heaven or not), it is clear that events sometimes elude us as the solutions. So I think that a culture of intellectual, reflective and evaluative and I mean, can not only benefit the people so that it can better understand what is about to choose or understand. Now to make a trivial example but understandable: what we teach programs such as those proposed Mediaset (including gossip, breasts and butts to the wind) or many others like that? and then, I did my own little research, the 'last year, choosing ten kiosks located around the city and the suburbs of Milan. Well, guess what are the magazines Bestsellers? I will say to those of the gossip. Now you understand what I mean by intellectual culture, which is reflective and evaluative. But how does it compare reading gossip or just looking breasts and butts!? How do I choose a party leader on its own information of this level, and if we go back in time, if you are affected by religion. (See DC). And then with the reckless statements of our current policy, as we think we believe in a better future. Not to mention, as many have already written, and 'own interests, of each, and not just politicians. The solution, then, for a better future is the culture and reflective intellectual. If a parent happy conversation with her son, they can only respond and learn, with perhaps more questions, and getting new answers. In the end, he would understand, you do not seem to 'start, but has learned. As if to say, the wolf exists, but there must also be those who recognize it and it flees or fights. For the rest of federalism seriously I would also agree, but I do not agree on the separation of the state.